All writing
Articles
Every piece we've published, starting with our founding series, The Game Under Review.
VAR Did Not Create Football's Problems. It Exposed Them.
VAR is not the root problem. It has exposed laws, decision processes, and governance habits that were never designed for forensic review.
Read the article →Offside Should Protect the Defensive Line, Not Punish Sprinting Mechanics
Offside should stop goal-hanging and clear unfair advantage, not punish the biomechanics of a well-timed attacking run.
Read the article →Slow Motion Can Find Contact. It Cannot Judge Football.
Video can establish facts, but football judgment still requires real speed, context, and an understanding of how the game is actually played.
Read the article →Hydration Breaks or Four-Quarter Football?
Player welfare matters, but universal stoppages risk reshaping football into a segmented, broadcast-friendly product.
Read the article →Injury Stoppages Are Becoming Tactical Timeouts
Football must protect injured players while preventing stoppages from becoming unearned coaching windows.
Read the article →The Founding Committee Responds
The first Pub Table discussion: five founding voices respond to the VAR and football governance debate.
Read the article →FIFA Put the Show Before the Football
A 27-minute halftime raises an important question: who was the World Cup Final really designed for?
Read the article →Why Not 48?
I was not persuaded by the case for a 48-team World Cup. Then I watched Cabo Verde.
Read the article →When Gamesmanship Becomes the Story
Football's governing bodies must ensure that matches are decided by skill — not by what officials fail to see.
Read the article →